What is augmented humanity? This term was coined by Google CEO Eric Schmidt in 2010 to describe the next generation of devices that respond to human needs and preferences. As next-generation technologies become more sophisticated, it will be possible to augment the capabilities of humans in several ways. For example, new technologies may improve productivity by removing barriers between employees and customers, or by arming them with data-driven insights. The question is, how far can this technology be developed and who will benefit the most?
The answer lies in the augmented human’s abilities to improve productivity. Wearable technologies and smartwatches equipped with motion sensors are examples of augmented humanity devices. They can enhance the senses and perceptions of users. Likewise, a near-field communication chip could replace an access card. Similarly, software that automates research and analytics could also be considered an augmented human device. In addition, this technology could lead to biases in the workplace.
But what about the ethical implications of this technology? It has been suggested that it might unbalance the game in favor of those with more money. However, this new technology is not exclusive to big tech companies. Small and medium-sized businesses have also become involved. In fact, one company even went as far as to use augmented humans in a game where the person with the most money would win. But this doesn’t necessarily mean it will unbalance the game.
The term “augmented human” has a variety of different meanings, and it depends on the context. It refers to technologies that enhance human productivity and capability. One such example is the RoboGlove. The RoboGlove is a human-augmented glove that has sensors on its fingertips. As a result, human augmentation is becoming a reality. This technology will help users to accomplish tasks that would be impossible with their own brain alone.